Wikipedia and credibility

25 06 2007

Ok. I like such kind of questions because I like to make research.Firstly I want to write about my experience with wikipedia.I don’t know why but I love this source of information.

Yeah I know sometimes information there can be far from neutrality ,or even  can contain some kind of mistakes but, they  are writing about it  they warning  you.And thats why to some extend they are credible and reliable.We have Russian saying that if you warned you are armed.

But once I made a mistake I rely to the information on wikipedia website while I was writing paper .And I havent check it anywhere else.

So have minus 3 points. Because Moldova have Parliamentary system not Presidential.It was previous semester !

Funny thing about that is  that they already fixed this mistake.

Also what i like there that you can add something or just edit,and for this purpose shouldn’t be an expert,or a scientist!!!!(:)

While I was searching in google I find sime interesting opinions of common ,plain people .

One of them I like most of all ,one guy was complaining that Wikipedia don’t give him a permission to edit .

And one  site and opinion which to my mind should be observed. There you can find some controversial facts.

Advertisement

Actions

Information

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.